Thanks Gerd I’ve not seen that I’m afraid even in the lbl From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. Gerd n Willink wrote Thanks for your advise. I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG From: GerdP [via GIS] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM To: n Willink Subject: Re: version numbers
There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. Don't you?
I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p56... Ciao, Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. NAML No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.