Hi Nick,


thanks for the motivation reg. "producing  a supplement".

In fact I thought about this quite often, but whenever I start to document such details

I feel very unsure about the format and the needed simplification.

I agree that the availabledocumentation (including wiki and other sources) is behind

the current knowledge represented by the code in mkgmap.

On the other hand, I do like to answer specific questions, because I can expect that the

reader really wants to know the details.

So, I don't see myself as an author, but I'd be happy to deliver answers.


Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von nwillink <osm@pinns.co.uk>
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juli 2016 10:50:47
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] improve LinePreparer to reduce img size
 
Hi Gerd

Many thanks for this brilliant and indeed crystal clear explanation!

I now understand when the trick is no longer feasible.

Ever considered producing  a supplement to Mechalas' great achievement?I'm
sure there
is a great demand for it.

Will now do some testing.

Thanks again

Nick



--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v1-improve-LinePreparer-to-reduce-img-size-tp5878545p5878624.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev