On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:45:35AM -0700, GerdP wrote:
Hi Marko,
Marko Mäkelä wrote
I think that the new code is generating noise for a U-shaped oneway "handles" on major twoway roads (a parking lane for making a break, only accessible from one direction of travelling). Here is an example:
when the message contains the word check it is for me. It means that I plan to verify that mkgmap does the right thing. I'll remove them later.
OK. But, like I said, a warning for this would be nice. The only_* looks better in JOSM and I suppose is easier to understand too, than the no_*. Here is one more strange message (no_u_turn with a via way). I see nothing wrong with the way: 2014/03/29 19:56:21 WARNING (RestrictionRelation): 63240005.osm.pbf: can't add restriction relation 532033 type no_u_turn Maybe the two oneway lanes of the road were merged to other ways, so that in the mkgmap routing graph, the two oneways and the via way form a loop of three ways? But still, the no_u_turn should make sense. Relations with access tags can sometimes be hard to understand, such as relation 2996233, which is type=no_u_turn, motor_vehicle=destination. I think that it would be better to avoid turn restrictions and tag the ways instead. That could be done in this case too. I will ask the mapper, because the role=to way looks like a stub. Marko