Hi all, thought again about my strategy and found a few problems with r3535: 1) If some houses near a given road have the addr:place tag and others have not, the latter may be ignored. 2) the heuristics is not prepared for the case that a tile might contains data for two different hamlets with the same name, e.g. in Germany we have ~ 50 different Holzhausen. Besides that the current code is much too complex. I am now trying to fix these problems. Gerd From: gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:51:58 +0200 Subject: [mkgmap-dev] r3535 with improved addr:place support Hi all, I think addr:place is now also working well, so please test it. See also the description of changes in the svn log: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=3535 If you think that numbers with addr:housenumber=* & addr:street=* & addr:place=* should not be treated as described, feel free to delete the addr:place tag. I still don't fully understand the special cases in CZ, the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProject_Czech_Republic/Address_sys... is not available in english and the Google Translator doesn't help me much, so experts for this area: Please double check. Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev