Hi Anor,

okay. There may also be different tags on the node and on the relation so that
your style produces two different POI (types) for the same location.
E.g. the relation may contain population=4920 and the node population=5012.
With the default style this would produce two different POI.
I see no simple way to handle that, and I think it should be fixed in OSM then.

Gerd

From: anorcarlos@hotmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:35:50 -0300
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] feedback for patch admin_centre-v1.patch ?

thank Gerd,

in Brazil identified that the solution removed most POI created by the add-poi-to-area where there is a admin_centre included in the boundary relation. Some insist on staying but we believe that other polygons are formatted incorrectly creating the POI with same name as the city within the area.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Anor C. A. de Souza Concórdia SC

From: gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 09:44:04 +0200
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] feedback for patch admin_centre-v1.patch ?

Hi all,

not sure if anybody noticed this post:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Fw-Help-tp5843021p5843485.html

I wrote that I'll commit it on sunday if I hear no complains,
but I would prefer to hear some positive feedback first ;-)

Gerd

_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev