data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Carlos, most of the options can be prefixed with no- since many years. Just to make sure: My suggestion was to keep --order-by-decreasing-area for the tiles and add --no-order-by-decreasing-area at the end for the combiners, esp. the overview map. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <carlos@alternativaslibres.org> Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 19:07 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map I had removed --order-by-decreasing-area from my command for DEM maps, but --no-order-by-decreasing-area seems to fix the problem by now. By the way, this option is not documented in options file and I can't find it in the code. Is --no a general switch for all options or is it a particular case for order-by-decreasing-area? I don't remember having seen it before. El 27/12/20 a las 10:36, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
I agree that --order-by-decreasing-area is to blame. This option seems to disturb the calculation of the overview map, and maybe the extreme size of the tile plays another role here.
I hope Ticker can help here, I think the option supresses the merging of shapes, and this is probably not a good idea for the 0x4a shapes.
As a work-around for you: Add option --no-order-by-decreasing-area at the end(!) of the parameter list so that the overview map is created without this option. This seems to fix the problem on my machine.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 09:36 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
Hi Carlos,
reg. the routing data: You can run display tool to check yourself, but the error is either in mkgmap or in display tool. My command looks like this : java -ea -cp d:\display\dist\display.jar;d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar test.check.NodCheck -vv --tab-zero=0 51145001.img > nodcheck.51145001.img 2> crash_nod It would be easier if you would post a link to your style.
I am now able to reproduce the display error using this command java -Xmx6G -ea -jar d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar --dem=f:\srtm3 --dem-poly=e:\carlos\australia.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=f:\osm\bounds.zip --precomp-sea=f:\osm\sea.zip --route --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,left --road-name-config=d:\mkgmap\resources\roadNameConfig.txt e:\carlos\51145001.o5m
and the overview map has the same amount of 0x4a and 0x4b polygons as yours from 11-error.zip.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <carlos@alternativaslibres.org> Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Dezember 2020 19:12 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
I'm sorry for the late response and for breaking the thread, but I didn't receive Gerd's last message, so I've had to copy it from mailing list archive. Reply inline.
OK, I think I understand what problem you see. I used JaVaWa MapConverter to install the map in 11-error.zip and 12-OK.zip played with it. With 11-error.zip only the data from the overview map is displayed when I zoom to e.g. S21.71088 E114.92708, while 12-OK.zip shows more details (this is with MapSource, in Basecamp I see details in both maps).
Yes, everything to the North of approx. S32.39125 is missing.
I tried to analyse your files and I see three suspicious things so far:
1) The routing data seems to be wrong, NodCheck reports "Could not find node for road 38a61 nod2=124c8 " for both tiles. I don't see such an error with the default style.
How can I check that? If both tiles are affected, probably this is not related with current issue, but other maps produced with the same style will also be wrong regarding routing.
2) The bad overview map contains a lot more 0x4a polygons. This is probably caused by the --order-by-decreasing-area, and I am not sure why this happens.
Do you think the problem is in the overview map or may be in tile map? If I open tile in MapEdit++ the number of non polygon elements is almost the same in wrong and correct maps. For example, number of roads is exactly the same. It seems as if something is masking part of the tile in MapSource (also in BaseCamp in my case); elements are there, but you can't see them.
3) You use a special version of mkgmap, so please try also with the latest version.
With latest mkgmap and default style problem persists.
My first guess was that the bad NOD file may cause this but the problem doesn't disappear when I remove the file 51145001.NOD, so this is probably not to blame. Same for the 51145001.DEM file.
I tried to reproduce the possible problem with the 0x4a tiles using the default style with this command java -Xmx4G -jar map.jar --route --gmapi --bounds=f:\osm\bounds.zip --precomp-sea=f:\osm\sea.zip --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --location-autofill=is_in,nearest f:\dwnload\temp\51145001.o5m but my overview map contains the same number of 0x4a tiles as your good map.
I cannot reproduce your DEM data because I don't know the polygon file (polygons/$pais.poly). Maybe I can reproduce the 0x4a problem when you create the test files again without --remove-ovm-work-files=true.
You can download polygon file from here <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/australia.poly> and ovm from here <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/ovm_51145001.img>.
El 22/12/20 a las 18:05, Carlos Dávila escribió:
I'm sorry, probably I didn't explain well enough.
Overview is always correct, the problem affects only tiles. As you saw in the screenshots of my first mail, they are different in size, but they are generated from the same input files, so they should have the same size. If you zoom in to an area that should be included in a tile, only overview map is shown, no detailed map. Even more, when you zoom in, at the given point where detailed map appears, tile boundary jumps to the correct size, but nothing but overview is displayed outside the "pruned" tile.
You can download correct and wrong files from the links below and play with them to get a better idea of the problem. They correspond to first tile of Australia as shown in my screenshots.
https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/11-error.zip
https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/12-OK.zip
Error was generated with java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt
OK was generated with java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt
Although removing --overview-dem-dist solved the issue in my first test (see command below, correct output), after a lot of tests removing options one by one from the original command, finally it seems the problem is caused by option --order-by-decreasing-area (or the combination of both).
java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --country-name=$PAIS --country-abbr=${ABR} --area-name="$MAPA" --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --product-version=$VERSION --series-name="OSM-$MAPA-DEM" --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG --process-destination --process-exits --housenumbers --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas --link-pois-to-ways --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares --license-file=license_OSM_${HGT} --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt
El 22/12/20 a las 10:15, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
It seems I still don't understand what the problem is or how to reproduce it. I tried this command and the overview map looks OK: java -Xmx4G -jar d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar --dem=f:\srtm3 --overview-dem-dist=128000 --show-profiles=1 --gmapi f:\dwnload\temp\51145001.o5m
If it is related to the DEM data I probably cannot help much. You may try a slightly different value for the --overview-dem-dist option or a modified polygon given with the --dem-poly option.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <carlos@alternativaslibres.org> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Dezember 2020 22:09 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
The problem seems to be caused by overview DEM. If I remove --overview-dem-dist option tile is complete in MapSource. The issue can be reproduced with this tile <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/51145001.o5m> and HGT from vierfinderpanoramas3
El 18/12/20 a las 11:48, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
not sure if I understand what the problem is. The two screenshots show completely different tile boundaries, so they were not created from the same splitter output.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cardavilam@gmail.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020 23:44 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
I build several types of map (OSM, OSM+contour lines, maps for trucks and OSM+DEM) for the same area, using same input files. I split country.o5m with splitter and then use the same template.args output by splitter for all maps, just changing mapname for the different types of map. Given that, all resulting mapsets should have the same tiles, but tiles in DEM map are smaller than in the other types. They share part of the boundaries (usually two of them) with other types, but other boundaries are moved in, reducing displayed tile size. See attached screenshots. However, file size is the same (discounting *.DEM) for each tile in *.gmap subfolders.
Command is quite similar for OSM and OSM+DEM maps:
java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --country-name=$PAIS --country-abbr=${ABR} --area-name=$MAPA --family-name="OpenStreetMap $MAPA" --family-id=1${FID} --product-version=$VERSION --series-name="OSM-$MAPA" --overview-mapname=${ABR}1${FID} --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}1${FID}000 --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG --process-destination --process-exits --housenumbers --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas --report-similar-arcs --report-dead-ends=2 --link-pois-to-ways --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares --license-file=license_OSM --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --check-styles -c $pais.args tmp/${ABR}1${FID}.txt
java --Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar --dem=hgt/LIDAR,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --dem-dists=3312,6624,9936,13248,26512 --overview-dem-dist=128000 -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --country-name=$PAIS --country-abbr=${ABR} --area-name="$MAPA" --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --product-version=$VERSION --series-name="OSM-$MAPA-DEM" --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG --process-destination --process-exits --housenumbers --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas --link-pois-to-ways --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares --license-file=license_OSM_${HGT} --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true -c ${pais}-DEM.args tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt
Both OSM and OSM+DEM maps can be downloaded from https://alternativaslibres.org/en/downloads.php#Oceania
Any idea why this happens?
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev