data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a979/4a9796c7cf556d5d140d8d6974156d35d3b842a8" alt=""
It's not what I meant. The example you provided is a multipolygon relation and multipolygons are always areas regardless if area=yes is set or not. So this is not a valid example, actually I can not find one really evident of missing area=yes on pedestrian areas. Lorenzo Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 17.37 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
Hi
I don't see anything in the OSM definition of a square that requires it to come from a multipolygon relation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
Ticker
On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 17:46 +0100, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote:
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 12.45 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
Hi Lorenzo
I know that the OSM definition says square should have area=yes, but I find a vast number where there is no area tag and they seem to be square/piazza, eg
This is a multipolygon. The current rule to handle this with the mkgmap:mp_created tag is fine for a default style in my opinion.
With Italy data from July 2018, I get about 5000 highway=pedestrian polygons without an area tag, and, from a small sample, about 1 in 3 look like piazza. The only effect is that a polygon is generated, it doesn't effect routes. I prefer to see the possible square rendered.
I don't. 1 in 3 correct is not so good :)
Ticker
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk