data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi WanMil, yes, I would prefer that you do it so that I can learn how it works. I found so many different ways to implement multi threading in Java (and we use many different ways in splitter and mkgmap). I simply have no idea which one is the best for our purposes. Gerd WanMil wrote
Hi WanMil,
attached patch corrects the known problems, it removes some debug or dead code and starts to complete javadoc.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5499705/boundary_prep_quadtree_v6.patch boundary_prep_quadtree_v6.patch
I did not yet fully understand the concept of the FutureTask, so I didn't dare to change BoundaryPreparer. I got the impression that this will require a lot more code in main, because we have to finish all preparer threads first.
I can have a look on it. It should not be a big deal but we can also change that at a later step.
WanMil
Gerd
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v6-LocationHook-with-new-Quadtree-tp549... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@.org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@.org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v6-LocationHook-with-new-Quadtree-tp549... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.