reg. speed: I can't reproduce that. I compared a split of Germany,
both versions (r321 and r325) are more or less running the same time.
Or did you mean the combination of splitter + mkgmap to process e.g. Asia?
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 18:22:00 +0200
From: extremecarver@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r325: improved split algo and new option
Seems to be much better now. I don't think I can increase the
max-nodes value though, but for most maps the new algo creates less
tiles for the same max-nodes value (e.g. Austria from 43 down to 35
for me, with the smallest tile now around 5MB instead of 2.8, and
the biggest 12MB instead of 11MB, for Asia I simultaneously
increased max-nodes from 800k to 900k- so I'm down from 624 tiles to
493.... and size from 970KB-16MB to now ). So it still seems to
depend on the country, but it's already a lot better...
It's a bit slower (about 10% more time)
On 06.05.2014 13:56, Gerd Petermann
wrote:
Hi all,
I've applied num-tiles-v1.patch and improved the split algo,
see
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/mkgmap-ToDo-list-tp5803388p5805165.html
It is now less likely that splitter creates tiles with a low
number of
nodes, it is more likely that all tiles have nearly the same
number of nodes,
and typically you will see fewer tiles.
Maybe this also means that you can increase the max-nodes value.
I hope this also reduces the need for complex interactions
between
spltter and mkgmap.
Gerd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix
openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev