data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Thorsten,
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:13:52 +0200 From: kukuk@suse.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] Overflow in splitter node counters
Hi Gerd,
On Mon, Apr 02, GerdP wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
attached is a patch for the problem reported here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bug-in-splitter-tp5610856p5610856.html
I don't have the data nor the machine to test it, so I tried to find all places were nodes are counted and changed the variables to long.
Thanks, at least for me it's working now.
Fine. Good to hear.
I did not find a good explanation for the small difference in the numbers: osmconvert reported 2518069911 nodes, which is ~ 2.518.069.911 -(2^31 - 1) = 370.586.264 - 2^31 + 370.586.264 =* -1.776.897.384* but splitter r200 reported * -1.776.905.107* nodes The formatting routine is not the reason. Any ideas?
The SRTM data has some duplicate nodes (duplicate as of same lat/lon, but different ID). Does one of the tools ignore them? At least mkgmap warns about them. Else no, I have no idea.
What is the value that the patched splitter reports for the coords occupancy? Here is what I see for a small file: ... *********************************************************** Final statistics *********************************************************** Needed dictionary entries: 25 of 65535 coords occupancy MAP occupancy: 7.544.535 ... Ciao, Gerd
Thorsten
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev