2 Jan
2014
2 Jan
'14
6:28 p.m.
Gerd, thanks for the review. I will wait a bit before committing to trunk, in case someone has another opinion.
I think it is ok to ignore the restriction, because we have no other code to interpret it.
My point is that there could be a style rule to interpret the type=restriction relation. (Maybe someone wants to create a map layer containing all ways or nodes participating in restrictions.) So, it would seem like a bug to silently discard the type=restriction relation if the built-in processing of it is disabled by a command-line option. But, I guess that we can leave it as is for now. Marko