data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d1a2/4d1a2cc1ca7193135c2a10650420a3ff228913ee" alt=""
Hi Gerd,
You should not get them without any option unless you modify the style.
I can't trace what is the primary cause of the problem. I have removed "make-opposite-cycleway" from options and added following lines to default style: highway=* & ( cycleway=opposite | cycleway=opposite_lane | cycleway=opposite_track | oneway:bicycle=no | bicycle:oneway=no ) { set oppoway=yes } highway=* & ( oneway=yes | oneway=1 | oneway=true | oneway=-1 ) & oppoway=yes {set oneway=no; set access=no; set bicycle=yes; name '${name} (rower)' } [0x10 road_speed=1 road_class=1 resolution 24 continue] If I compile map with trunk r3129 then I get additional cycleway with name including "(rower)". If I compile with patched mkgmap, I get two additional cycleways, one with "(rower)" in name, second with "(Cycleway)", exactly like when I use option "make-opposite-cycleway". No problem with default style - no additional cycleway, when no changes in style. I have attached modified style, a data sample and a batch for mkgmap. Watch the way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226392273
what about keeping only the make-opposite-cycleway option?
That is the only option, which I use. I don't see advantages of other cycleways options. But maybe there are some? -- Best regards, Andrzej