4 Feb
2020
4 Feb
'20
11:49 p.m.
Hi all, thanks for the ongoing development. I like the abstraction that Gerd has given, be it with digits or letters; and its implementation of all Tickers 6 cases. With his explanation I could easily reproduce my simple but satisfying cemetery results as by 4418. On Tickers argumentation my idea is limited, as I´m not able to understand all code internals he might has in mind. Despite this - and if I got him correctly that it´s this logic we have now - it sounds adequate as well for what I can overlook. Regarding the splitting proposed by Arndt I think it´s not always useful. To handle improper drawings in OSM I´d prefer such a behaviour to be definable then. Don´t know if I could need it. Jan