On 19.01.2010 00:02, svn commit wrote: 
Version 1498 was commited by steve on 2010-01-18 23:02:57 +0000 (Mon, 18 Jan 2010) 

Reduces style rule syntax errors that are caused
by terms being in the wrong order.

Terms in the expression are now re-arranged accross the whole of the
expression and not just the first two terms.  So if there is a term that can be
indexed that can be moved to the front without changing the meaning of
the expression, then it should now happen.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

rev 1498 has broken oneway handling: I put it here because the other topic got pretty of-topic. So related to oneway=reverse handling broken:


 I could lock down the problem(s).

1. with the new code, prefixing highway=* is needed for the "continue" command to work properly (in case no highway=abc is present in the line).
2. There is no difference in how mkmgap handles oneway=-1 and oneway=reverse. The oneway code got broken with rev: 1498 however. It is not possible to use "set oneway=yes" on ways that already had oneway=-1 or oneway=reverse. No problem however with other oneway values such as yes/true/1. Before my results were different, because it got broken by 1. before. So there is simply a problem with turning the direction around of oneway=-1 and oneway=reverse and "continue".

Now we shouldn't say the "continue" code is broken, but better would be to ditch the old conditional rules without 0x?? and replace them with [continue with_actions]. Then oneway=-1 and oneway=reverse handling should be put into the stylefile as a simple line:

highway=* & ( oneway=-1 | oneway=yes ) {mkgmap:turnhighway=yes} [continue with_actions]

to turn around the direction of a street. The alternative would be to turn around streets before running the style-file, and then set oneway=-1/oneway=reverse  to  oneway=yes. This was the way mkgmap worked until rev 1497.
Being able to use [continue with_actions] instead of the old conditional code, would be much better and more comprehensible. Actually the style-branch should behave just like this. Alternatively the behaviour of current conditional rules should be changed to be handled as if [continue with_actions] without assigning 0x* were used.