Hi WanMil,

okay, I agree that we might need the data. What do you think about removing it when it lies in a
boundary that has the same postal_code?

Gerd

> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:22:19 +0100
> From: wmgcnfg@web.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. precompiled bounds
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> it depends on how exact you want to be.
> In most cases you won't require building with a postal_code tag. But if
> the building contains a POI without a postal_code you might need it.
> I know this example is a bit too meticulous but it shows the general
> problem we have unless there is a commonly used tagging for postal_code
> areas.
>
> WanMil
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > some of the precompiled bounds contain quite a lot of buildings with a
> > postal_code tag, e.g.
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/25587396
> > or
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/60792963
> >
> > Is this info really needed in the location hook? It seems to slow down the
> > creation of the quadtree.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Gerd
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Question-reg-precompiled-bounds-tp7217885p7217885.html
> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev