data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Eric, a routable way with access=no is not the same as a non-routable way. If the motorway is a line without road_class or road_speed it is not routable. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von AnkEric <eric_internet@casema.nl> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. März 2020 18:27 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question (only): Is mkgmap-default-style Routing by foot/bicycle according to Usecase ?
reg. 3) are you sure that the motorway is routable in your map
My Map (with or without quotes), is a Bicycle Map ONLY. All highways are either [bicycle=yes] OR [bicycle=no]. If [bicycle=no] this implies a highway is NOT routable (access=no). Therefore all the non-routable ways are gray and ignored for routing (by BaseCamp, GPS and navigator Anke). Simpel; -) So selecting a vehicle type for routing is not relevant. Exception: routing by foot on a bicycle map will ignore [oneway=yes]. Which is sometimes a way out if OSM-Mapping is not correct (oneway=yes without oneway:bicycle=no).
and that the via points are at the same place?
Yes they are. I Set 2 Waypoints and 1 Viapoint, Create Route and THEN ONLY Switch Map. And Recalculate Route.
My understanding is that the Garmin routing algo ignores all restrictions when the via or target point is only reachable on a "prohibited" road.
No answer before dinner and I have to think about what you mean... to be continued... Eric -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev