> probably patch v6 makes opposite-cycleway obligatory, I get them without
> any option.

What do you mean? You should not get them without any option
unless you modify the style.


>
> I have tried simplified version of ligfietser declarations for style and
> current mkgmap r3129. This has created a cycleway before original road
> with all the problems like in v5. Additionally there is a problem with
> house numbers which becomes attached to cycleway. In my case cycleway
> has a name modified to include "(cycleway)", so I would expect that
> addr:street of a point shouldn't match.
>
> Version with cycleway created after original road would be quite
> complex, I have dropped this idea.

I see. Adding the cycleway later requires a huge amount of continue
statements and much more logic to avoid duplicated roads :-(

So, what about keeping only the make-opposite-cycleway option?

Gerd