data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Steve, Steve Ratcliffe wrote
Hi Gerd
I found differences for roads which are divided into multiple parts . The polyline parts "arrive" in different order in the RoadDef.addPolylineRef method.
OK so I wrote code to check this. However...
1. In a complete map of the UK I did not see a single example of there being more than one line in the same RoadDef (at the same level).
2. Lines joining within the same RoadDef is not strictly required as there are many unconnected lines in non-mkgmap maps.
I do see the breakage with --transparent in a UK map, so it looks as if there is another reason for it.
thanks, I will try. I saw these effects in the austria map. The effect of the --transparent option is only a change in the number of shapes. This means also a change in the number of sub divisions and how different parts of a road are distributed to these sub divisions. So, --transparent doesn't directly cause a problem. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-highwayCount-tp5748554p5748810.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.