Are all highway=* & area=yes really ignored for routing? There are plenty of cases of highway=residential & area=yes and I think they should be routable. I know way 109862652 should have a name tag (Plaza de los Bermejales as well) but if a way with the same name than addr:street already exists, shouldn't it be used for address search? El 11/12/15 a las 09:41, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
I think the problem is that the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110145380 is tagged with area=yes and therefore it is ignored for routing, means, it is not added as a road. Besides that highway=residential way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109862652 is not tagged with name=*.
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam@orangecorreo.es> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 20:09 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?
I have found several cases where mkgmap complains no road is found for a given address but there's a pedestrian highway with the correct name next to the address nodes/ways. See for example: 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2534468261 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246230812 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 6(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232406 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 7(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232873 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales 9(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246233710 and way 110145380