data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/802f4/802f43eb70afc2c91d48f43edac9b0f56b0ec4a4" alt=""
Hi
live with that very easily, but I wonder if the final value of that "implication" could be propagated to the TRE header somehow, so it is simpler to document and understand?
The way that the implied value is transmitted to the NOD header does not work in the case that you have max-jobs greater than one and you are compiling files with differing left/right sides. So I am not keen to extend that any further.
Any idea if the "base map" vs. "detail map" flag (0x01) is important? I
It can't be that important, given that have survived this long without it. But I think we should set it. Could you let me know which byte in the header it is or create a patch.
noticed that the maps produced by mkgmap are "base maps" whereas Garmin's own maps are "detail maps". Similarly with the "background=water" vs "background=land" (0x10) which ImgTool also reveals.
I don't know anything about this one. It sounds like it might be important though. ..Steve