Will do. Until rev 984 performance is good (o.k got a bit slower, but that's o.k.), 988 got intolerable and 991 seems to need twice as much time as 988. Im still waiting for 991 to run through and then test on with -agentlib. I will continue testing and update you on the results in a few hours.

Mark Burton wrote: 
Hi Felix,

  
I think during the last weeks the increased feature set of mkgmap is 
really nice, not so nice is the performance though.....
I made some tests - see below. I think with the current versions 
performance really has gone by the wayside. It takes 4times as long 
against austria.osm compared to rev 937.
    

Please add the following to your java options and post the resulting
java.hprof.txt file to the list or to me directly. Then we will know
where the time is going.

-agentlib:hprof=cpu=samples,depth=20

Cheers,

Mark
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev