Hi Gerd 0x11f is the same as 0x11f00 - both have been valid expressions in the past. However, the style checker tells me that 11f is invalid. This applies to I think all extended types , ie it tells me 10A (without the 00) is invalid. It accepts 10A00 but not 10A It accepts 11F00 but not 11F I agree 10A00 is the more accurate way of defining an extended line but it might be confusing to flag them as invalid. r Nick On 30/12/2013 15:49, GerdP [via GIS] wrote:
Hi,
yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type. What bug do you mean? Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00 when used in the lines or polygons file?
Gerd
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800
From: [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=0> To: [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=1> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
Hi
Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.
It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in my TYP file.
invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE
It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is correctly identified as valid. I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes.
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=2> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=3> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p57912...
To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click here <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5791157&code=b3NtQHBpbm5zLmNvLnVrfDU3OTExNTd8MTM1NTM3MTE1MQ==>. NAML <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p57912... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.