On 18.11.2010 23:34, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi
I think inventing such an operator would be a bad idea. It would be much easier to have a genenral negation i.e.
!(expression) The style rules already allow general negation.
If I've understood the conversation, then:
!(tracktype< 5)
does exactly what Felix wants it to do.
..Steve This would work for a single condition. But not for does not exist or. (or else I'm too stupid). However I think something like this won't work So would (!(tracktype<5)|condition2=yes) work? Meaning either tracktype not equal smaller 5 or condition2=yes - one of the two has to match for it to not stop the action. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev