Yeah that's true, but how to do it better? I would think a name-file where you can run rules for name, info sections , phone numbers, etc. seperate from the style-file would be best. Currently of my lines style-file which consists of 8.000 lines, 7.000 are basically only to get proper naming, ideally I have to blow it up million lines to get all attributes into the name that I would like to be stated there. As the name is in the route sections the only way to quickly check whether or not a route planned by autorouting (be it gps or mapsource) is nice or not. Felix Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Felix,
This is not a comment on your proposed scheme but I do believe that the current handling of name and ref (and the highway shields, etc.) is completely fucked up. IMHO, munging the element name and its refs together in the style file is completely bogus.
Cheers,
Mark _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev