On 11/08/12 11:49, WanMil wrote:
Yes, I did not bear in mind that the city name is completely empty. Maybe this info is also helpful for Steve but I will also check the mkgmap code what's happening with elements without a city name.
That is what I think, if the city is empty then the closest city is used (MapBuilder.java:386). I checked with your Il Piacere restaurant example and that is what is happening.
I got a different city than you, Aldrans rather than Natters.
The city is in the img tile itself, and is not changed by the index.
..Steve
I agree. I wonder if we should change the behaviour if no city name is found should be changed: 1. Is it possible to have an empty city name? I think mkgmap users do not expect that the nearest algorithm is used if city name could not be assigned and location-autofill=nearest is not set. If the city name could not be empty we could set a default city name. 2. The nearest algorithm uses city POIs only. At the time the algorithm was implemented this was a reasonable choice. I would now change that to use all POIs so that neighboured POIs with a city information could be used to find the city name. In this case an addr:city tag of a neighboured POI could also be used to set the city name of surrounding POIs without city information. For backward compatibiilty we could add a new location-autofill option for this. What do you think? WanMil