data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Marko, sounds not bad. We could remove the --link-pois-to-ways option. The style author can decide whether to display the barrier and only those nodes with mkgmap:barrier=yes are considered for routing. Gerd
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:31:01 +0300 From: marko.makela@iki.fi To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] barrier=lift_gate
Hi Gerd,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:57:38PM -0700, GerdP wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that the default style is a bit strange regrading barriers:
The barrier at node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1597509392#map=19/52.21425/8.81559 has an influence on routing (with --link-pois-to-ways), but it is not displayed in the map.
The reason is that we use barrier=* when we evaluate the effect on routing, but we display only specific barriers: barrier=bollard | barrier=bus_trap | barrier=gate [0x660f resolution 24] barrier=block | barrier=cycle_barrier | barrier=stile | barrier=kissing_gate [0x660f resolution 24]
I think we should display all barriers which have an effect on routing, but I am not sure what to change in the style.
Any suggestions?
What about the following:
barrier=* { set mkgmap:barrier=yes } [0x660f resolution 24]
Then, change the internal processing to look for mkgmap:barrier instead of barrier. In this way, certain barriers can be ignored by style file authors.
Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev