Hi all, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4081 Please ignore run time of bicubic-spline method for now, I think optimized version should be as slow as bicubic, at the moment it is slower. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von osm@pinns <osm@pinns.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 17:16:17 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation Hi Gerd and Andrzej I think that makes sense top make it more flexible. I found the following interpolation NearestNeighbor Bilinear BicubicCardinal BicubicBSpline BicubicBCSpline Nick On 23/01/2018 15:28, Andrzej Popowski wrote:
Hi Gerd,
maybe we can wait a bit with optimization? What I would like to get is an option for mkgamp, that will allow for testing quality of all these versions of interpolation. For now we have bilinear, bicubic and bicubic spline. This all could be included in code and selected by user.
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev