Can it be like this? So I can just comment the second rule to be happy :) highway=pedestrian & (area=yes | mkgmap:mp_created=true) [0x17 resolution 22] # assume that a closed way with highway=pedestrian is meant to describe an area even if area=yes is missing highway=pedestrian & area!=no [0x17 resolution 22] Il giorno lun, 07/01/2019 alle 10.20 +0000, Gerd Petermann ha scritto:
I think it is OK when you add a comment like # assume that a closed way with highway=pedestrian is meant to describe an area even if area=yes is missing
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev < mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin < rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Januar 2019 10:55 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements
Hi
Reading some of the relevant wiki pages, I am finding the wording ambiguous.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
It seems wrong that the handling of the area= tag is not consistent between polygons generated from closed ways and those generated by multipolygon relations, but, if you assert that it is, I'll respect it.
Regardless, there are a lot of Piazzas that are not generated from a multipolygon and don't have the area tag, eg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/601220094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256580148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173770171
My 'polygons' change as it stands:
highway=pedestrian & area!=no [0x17 resolution 22]
will show these as piazza, along with other areas that might not be. If I change it to:
highway=pedestrian & (area=yes | mkgmap:mp_created=true) [0x17 resolution 22]
it won't show them.
Which is preferred?
Ticker
On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 20:37 +0100, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote:
It's not what I meant.
The example you provided is a multipolygon relation and multipolygons are always areas regardless if area=yes is set or not. So this is not a valid example, actually I can not find one really evident of missing area=yes on pedestrian areas.
Lorenzo
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 17.37 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
Hi
I don't see anything in the OSM definition of a square that requires it to come from a multipolygon relation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
Ticker
On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 17:46 +0100, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote:
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 12.45 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
Hi Lorenzo
I know that the OSM definition says square should have area=yes, but I find a vast number where there is no area tag and they seem to be square/piazza, eg
This is a multipolygon. The current rule to handle this with the mkgmap:mp_created tag is fine for a default style in my opinion.
With Italy data from July 2018, I get about 5000 highway=pedestrian polygons without an area tag, and, from a small sample, about 1 in 3 look like piazza. The only effect is that a polygon is generated, it doesn't effect routes. I prefer to see the possible square rendered.
I don't. 1 in 3 correct is not so good :)
Ticker
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk