On 04.02.2011 18:10, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:38:56PM +0100, Minko wrote:
In the typ file you can't define what kind of road it is in the TYP file, if both roads are set to the same 0x07 type. So there you can only set the label to cycleway/service road and see what the navigation does.
It's sad that the newer Garmin's only can display a very limited number of line types without a typ file, but there is another alternative: How about working with overlays?
line style file:
highway=cycleway [0x070d] highway=service [0x070e]
overlay style file:
0x070d: 0x07, 0x0d 0x070e: 0x07, 0x0e
Routing will be fine, because Garmin only uses 0x07 Without a typ file, GPS unit and Mapsource show only 0x07 because 0x0d / 0x0e are invisible Without a typ file, the Edge 705 ought to show a black line (0x0d or 0x0e) overlaid with the dashed brown line (0x07).
If you are working WITH a typ file and the default style, this option does offer the possibility to set a label or colour to 0x0d and 0x0e Yes, that would make sense when using a TYP file.
Speaking of invisble lines, this is also working for bridges:
(bridge=yes | bridge=true | bridge=viaduct) [0x2b resolution 23 continue with_actions]
Without a typ file, bridges are not visible, just the highway. With a typ file, type 0x2b can be made visible with the highway. I got another idea: What if we create a default-typ style based on the default style, similar to the marine style? It would define overlays for bridges, tunnels, oneways and such. The prerequisite for this would be a TYP file that can be distributed with mkgmap (with an appropriate license and some maintainer). The default-typ style would only contain the tweaks; most definitions would still be in the default style.
Best regards,
Marko _______________________________________________
Without typfile lines are not automatically and in all Mapsource / GPS versions invisible or not to distinguish. I would not include invisible (without assigning them invisible by using a typfile) roads into the default style. BTW: the points file resolutions should be drastically reduced. I would basically reduce all but cities to 24. Then maybe put some into 23 and look if there is a need for any (and that they are shown as well, else it is just wasted space) POI except cities in 22 from a general usepoint.