data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/023a9/023a9098d5847ef2b288898f55b229c476c05b2f" alt=""
El 10/08/10 15:12, Marko Mäkelä escribió:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
Marko Mäkelä schreef:
I am planning to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from highway=trunk and to restore non-bicycle paths to road_speed=0.
I'd suggest you don't. I do not know why bicycle routing differs. Adding random patches to my random reports won't help.
It is not totally random. Someone just yelled that defaulting bicycle=no on highway=trunk is not right, and I cannot disagree with that. If there is no traffic sign that prohibits bicycles and pedestrians, then they are allowed. And I haven't seen such traffic signs in Finland, except in some places when there is a cycleway next to the highway=trunk. Just to add information from some other place, in Spain trunk roads are allowed for bicycles and pedestrians; only motorways are forbidden for them. So +1 to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from me too.