Hi all,
I think I should add that in Germany we have thousands of these
ways, and I am very sure that most of them are paved.
The reason is that Germany is full of signs like 237 , 241, and 242
(see http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/)
and that page still recommends to use the tags "highway=path" and
"bicycle=designated" for them. In Germany a cyclist has to use these
ways, so you can be pretty sure that they are paved.

So, maybe we can add an exception for Germany?
Gerd


GerdP wrote

> Hi all,
>
> I just noted that the default style sets the mkgmap:unpaved
> flag for many cycleways, e.g.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276070019
>
> I see intensive discussions about wrong use of
> highway=path and/or wrong interpretation of that tag.
>
> The rule in lines is
> (highway=bridleway | highway=path | highway=track | highway=unsurfaced)
> & surface!=* & tracktype!=* & smoothness!=* & sac_scale!=*
> { add mkgmap:unpaved=1 }
>
> My understanding is that highway=track is likely to be unpaved, but
> highway=path doesn't suggest that, esp. not in combination with
> bicycle=designated.
>
> Does anybody have a better solution?
>
> Gerd
>

> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev@.org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/default-style-highway-path-means-unpaved-tp5854174p5854203.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev