data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Uli, thanks for the hint. I'll experiment with this in future. At the moment I don't know of any bottlenecks which could be solved by this. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von UliBaer <ulibaer@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 13:23:50 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Move to Java 1.8 Gerd Petermann wrote
Hi Uli,
do you have an example for me?
Gerd
Hi Gerd, i'll have to look deeper into the source code, but i assume, mkgmap also uses list operations in the calculations? I had major performance gains in a commercial project, migrating bigger and longish list operations from standard api to Java 8 streaming api, especially by using the parallel streams on multi core machines. Best regards, Uli -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Move-to-Java-1-8-tp5879546p5879580.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev