However it is processed with autojar (http://autojar.sourceforge.net/) to contain only the classes that we require, as suggested on the home page of fastutil (http://fastutil.dsi.unimi.it/)
Ah, I see. I don't see autojar in any of the public Maven repositories; we may have to put it up on ivy.mkgmap.org.uk.
Yes annoying... Other possible options are: * proguard which can be used without its normal obfuscation functionality, I think. * or it may be possible to use the <classfileset> ant task.
I think I'd prefer to trim fastutil as part of the build process for a few reasons:
Yes, I'm generally in favour of that option too. If it is too slow for general use (can't remember how long it takes), the its OK with me if there is a separate create-the-distribution step. ..Steve