Re: [mkgmap-dev] Missing ways part 2

Marko Mäkelä wrote:

Last time I was bicycling/mapping there, I got confused, because I thought that there would be a connection between the highway=residential (Kaskelanpolku) and the highway=secondary (Lahdentie). Of course, the tunnel would not be considered for routing, because the ways share no nodes, but the ways seemed to be connected on the map display.

Hi, maybe this rules before your highway-rules in lines-file would solve your problem: bridge=yes | bridge=true [0x28 resolution 21 continue] tunnel=yes | tunnel=true [0x27 resolution 21 continue] aighes -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Missing-ways-part-2-tp5647895p5649892.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.