I vote for repairing it. I have read the multipolygon and boundary wiki pages again and again and think that they don't allow using the boundary-segment relations to compose the complete boundary relation. Anyhow mapnik does not support using boundary segments and that's a good explanation why reverting the edit of Loll78 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8535622). WanMil
It appears someone (I can't find out who) likes the boundary_segments a lot. The three boundary_segments of Luxembourg now make up the Luxembourg border. That's in my opinion inconsistent with map_features and with the tagging of all other European countries. Personally I dislike boundary_segments: logically I understand it, although - also logically- it should also be used on continents, regions, cities etcetera which would be uncontrollable
If nobody opposes I'll repair the Luxembourg border relation somewhere wednesday evening
Cheers, Johan
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:56:24 +0200, WanMil wrote:
Today I observed that the boundary relation of Luxembourg was changed in a way that it does not contain the boundary ways itself but links to other relations that contain parts of the boundary (Luxembourg/Belgium; Luxembourg/Netherlands etc.).
I am not sure if that's an accepted scheme for mps/boundaries. Does anyone know if that's correct and accepted? Should mkgmap support this?
WanMil _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev