Hi Ticker, hmm, the messages are produced because I abuse the Boundary classes for the ResidentialHook. It should say landuse=residential instead of admin_level=11. I'll see if I can fix that. Anyway, the data in that area is probably wrong as landuse areas should not overlap. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap@jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. März 2017 18:10:49 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential Hi Gerd For an unrelated reason, I was just comparing logs of a run with trunk (r-3834) with my version which contains up to r-3831 and mix of some of your patches and my changes and, for trunk, for I get 140 or so lines like: WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree 74220042.osm.pbf: incorrect data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.795731&mlon=1.157684&zoom=17&way= 258759285 intersection of boundaries with same admin_level (11) w258759285 w75394535 WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree 74220042.osm.pbf: incorrect data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.849289&mlon=1.089020&zoom=17&way= 199897090 intersection of boundaries with same admin_level (11) w199897090 w60808537 Command was: java -ea -Dlog.config=../mkgmap_log.props -jar ../mkgmap.trunk/mkgmap.jar --generate-sea=multipolygon --input -file=74220042.osm.pbf Not a problem for me, but can provide more info if required Regards Ticker On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 16:59 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
I'd also like to know if it you have an idea how to improve the usability in case that it doesn't work ;-)
Gerd
________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von nwillink <osm@pinns.co.uk> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 12:53:04 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Hi Gerd
Thanks for the suggestion - will let you know when successful
r
Nick
On 05/03/2017 11:43, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: Hi Nick,
maybe you can check mkgmap:admin_level9..11 to decide if an element is in a village?
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=1>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:46:56 An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=2> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Ok Gerd
I didn't realise that , no wonder I'm having problems
Thanks for looking into that.
On 05/03/2017 10:44, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: Nick, sorry, I don't get it.
With the patch the value in the new tag mkgmap:residential is evaluated before any style rule is used. I see no way for you to pass the information from a node or way with place=village to another element with building=*
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=1>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:32:14 An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=2> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Gerd, that is a good point
It was just a thought that since points are parsed first one could perhaps set a flag when place=village is true
then
mkgmap:residiential=* & village=true . --> show buildings
So I was not thinking of mkgmap specifically
On 05/03/2017 10:08, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: Please explain what you meant with "Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in villages/hamlets..."
Would that be code in mkgmap or in your style? Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=1>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:03:56 An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=2> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Ok Thanks
On 05/03/2017 09:34, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: Hi Nick,
hmm, not sure what you want to point out. The tag mkgmap:residential may be set to other values than "yes", e.g. ways located in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454954092 should have mkgmap:residential=Bahnhofsviertel
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=0>> im Auftrag von nwillink <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=1>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 10:27:03 An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=2> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
Thanks Gerd
Works a treat although in my style I had to use
building=* & mkgmap:residential=yes {delete building}
in both polygons and lines (outlines).
Your efforts provide an addiitional bonus in that you may just want to show just the faint outlines of buildings.
Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in villages/hamlets...
Nick
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1 -nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892424.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=3> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=4> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside ntial-tp5892342p5892425.html To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here. NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________ View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892426.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=3> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside ntial-tp5892342p5892427.html To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here. NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________ View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892429.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=3> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside ntial-tp5892342p5892430.html To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here. NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________ View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892431.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=3> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside ntial-tp5892342p5892434.html To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, click here. NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
________________________________ View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892437.html> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev