Hi, the last days I've worked on code to separate plausible from unplausible addr:interpolation data. I think that 10-20 % of all address data in Canada looks wrong or is duplicate or both. Even worse, the data is extremely detailed, so maybe one has to know a trick to use it, else I think it should be removed. What would be the right place to discuss that? Gerd Thorsten Kukuk wrote
On Fri, Feb 27, Gerd Petermann wrote:
I think the house number data provided by these imports is more or less garbage. I see many ways like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133338396 It is an addr:interpolation way connecting two different points which both have addr:housenumber=5 addr:street=20th Sideroad
In many cases I see two of these meaningless objects, one with source=NRCan-CanVec-8.0, one with source=NRCan-CanVec-10.0.
I think the only way to handle this data is to ignore it, if mkgmap finds an addr:interpolation way connecting two equal numbers, we should ignore the numbers. Right?
Yes.
Thorsten
-- Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@.org
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/weired-housenumbers-in-Canada-tp5835196p58382... Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.