data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0134/f0134b5004a2a90c1324ff9331e4ce1f20ff1c83" alt=""
Hi Minko, that sounds like the original list was not so bad: //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b || type == 0x16; what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ? 0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is it the only one? Gerd
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:29:21 +0200 From: ligfietser@online.nl To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
Hi Gerd
If I got that right, we should 1) warn when the style file lines uses types 0x02 - 0x09 without road class/speed if -check-styles is used
2) warn if a line is added multiple times, once with type between 0x01 and 0x3f and road class/speed, once with type 0x02 - 0x09 and without road class/speed.
I've implemented that with r3267.
Gerd
I also found errors with 0x01, 0x10, 0x13 but not 0x18 or 0xa
So better warn with 0x01-0x13;0x16 without road class/speed _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev