> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> From: chris66nrw@gmx.de
> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:50:31 +0100
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Access flag question
>
> Am 19.01.2014 11:18, schrieb Gerd Petermann:
>
> > I think the idea of the change was that the java code should not
> > interpret the meaning of osm
> > tags like private. So, the style author has to decide what that means to him
> > and set the mkgmap:xxx values accordingly.
>
> So, "destination" has to be mapped to "no"?
>
> But in this case a footway would (in the img file)
> have the same flags as a destination road.
> (car=no)
>
> Just want to make sure that this case:
>
> <http://up.picr.de/17095866ev.jpg>
>
> is handeled correctly.
>
> >> Are other values than "no" being recognized?
> >>
> >> What about "private" and "destination"?
>
> Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev