Steve,

as already announced:
with all the intensive testing regarding unicode, gmap and others I found following in my opinion strange behaviour in relation to gmapsupp format:
This raises my concern about product-version not properly handled in the gmapsupp conversion.

Yes, I know, a gmapsupp.img may contain more than only one product/family/map...
But as mkgmap creates a gmapsupp.img for one product/family only per run it might be worth writing the version info properly into the header ?
.... other maps (official ones) seem to propagate the release information into that header field.

I'm not completely sure if above assumptions are correct or if I missed something.

Sorry for bringing up another issue.... ;-)
And thanks for looking at it.

Cheers
Patrik