data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed4f2/ed4f2b5f66085b298deb2e8459f08b25909372d6" alt=""
Marco, Does this work as a relation?
#boundaries
boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14]
It looks nice for Italy.
Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus <osm@na1400.info> wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------