Hi Thorsten,

I think something must be wrong. I would not expect a change in file sizes and I did not
see one in my test data.
The patch verify_boundary_v3.patch doesn't remove any data, so I assume that
you have applied one of the older patches.
Can you please verify that ?
The correct patch contains a line with
Collections.reverse(coords);

Gerd

> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:49:59 +0100
> From: kukuk@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Again NullPointerException
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, GerdP wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as a result of previous discussions here is th new patch.
> >
> > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5471749/verify_boundary_v3.patch
> > verify_boundary_v3.patch
>
> With mkgmap-r2205, with and without this patch, I get an expecption
> on the planet data from 2012-02-10:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError
> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryUtil.loadBoundaryFile(BoundaryUtil.java:145)
>
> If I disable the assert, mkgmap-r2205 finishes building boundarys
> without problems.
>
> There is only one big difference in the boundary data:
> The boundary data created by mkgmap with this patch is 15% smaller
> than the one created without this patch.
>
> I don't know how to compare best which data is missing, but I think
> 15% is a lot. Or is this expected?
>
> Thorsten
>
> --
> Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev