data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2008d/2008dd7a56a8418c6059684f465e5e7e20e77e78" alt=""
Hi Gerd, Yes, that's correct. The patch will have no effect until the bounds are updated to OSM data that's newer than 27 April 2015. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenchen@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ben,
thanks for the patch. Just to make sure: The additional rules have no effect until one has updated bounds, so I can commit that without causing trouble, right?
Gerd
------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:43:03 +0200 From: ben@bagu.org To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities
Hi Gerd,
I was a bit wrong with my analysis of Ottawa and Toronto. Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 8 and the 'cities' within Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 9 (as Orleans was already tagged). I've corrected the labelling issues in OSM but I didn't add the missing 'city' boundaries inside Ottawa.
I've attached a patch that corrects address search for Toronto and Ottawa. You'll need updated bounds data for this to work but I have confirmed that it's working. It would be nice to get this included in mkgamp.
Thanks, Ben
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev