March 2024 - mkgmap-dev - The mkgmap lists

Road Number not showing in map
by Joao Almeida 22 Mar '24

22 Mar '24

Hi, I've recently compiled a map for Morroco. And found that I don't have the road number for some roads showing up. This is because I do not include the ref tag in the name. How can I create a logic in the style so that it shows the REF tag if there is no road name but if there is a road name can the name be displayed instead? Thank you!

2 2

Splitter Java Heap
by Felix Herwegh 21 Mar '24

21 Mar '24

Hi, switching to my Ultrabook (6 GB) while travelling I recently faced some kind of borderline condition with splitter. On the first run it throws "OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space", on closely subsequent runs without any modifications it does not. Repeating the task after some delay fails again. I guess, there might be some self-optimization involved for this. /fail: ... 40.000.000 ways parsed... id=888262666 Number of stored tile combinations in multiTileDictionary: 4.525 41.000.000 ways parsed... id=929920953 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at uk.me.parabola.splitter.tools.SparseLong2IntMap$ChunkMem.<init>(SparseLong2IntMap.java:189) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.tools.SparseLong2IntMap.saveCurrentChunk(SparseLong2IntMap.java:627) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.tools.SparseLong2IntMap.replaceCurrentChunk(SparseLong2IntMap.java:886) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.tools.SparseLong2IntMap.put(SparseLong2IntMap.java:691) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.SplitProcessor.processWay(SplitProcessor.java:149) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.AbstractMapProcessor.consume(AbstractMapProcessor.java:84) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.OSMFileHandler.execute(OSMFileHandler.java:157) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.writeTiles(Main.java:542) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.start(Main.java:132) at uk.me.parabola.splitter.Main.main(Main.java:81) Elapsed time: 8m 0s Memory: Current 1466MB (1339MB used, 127MB free) Max 1466MB/ /success: ... 48.000.000 ways parsed... id=1262369277 Writing relations Tue Mar 19 10:50:36 CET 2024 100.000 relations parsed... id=1783690 200.000 relations parsed... id=4148045 300.000 relations parsed... id=7895430 400.000 relations parsed... id=11681672 500.000 relations parsed... id=15581604 coord Map: 312.851.126 stored long/int pairs require ca. 3 bytes per pair. 14.225.657 chunks are used, the avg. number of values in one 64-chunk is 21. coord Map details: ~852 MB, including 88 array(s) with 8 MB way Map: 48.015.926 stored long/int pairs require ca. 3 bytes per pair. 3.974.651 chunks are used, the avg. number of values in one 64-chunk is 12. way Map details: ~123 MB, including 10 array(s) with 8 MB JVM Memory Info: Current 1466MB (1357MB used, 109MB free) Max 1466MB Full Node tests: 62.230.523 Quick Node tests: 282.354.912 Thread worker-2 has finished ... / My main machine has 24 GB of main memory, and runs troublefree using the following memory allocation on the same task: /JVM Memory Info: Current 3342MB (2378MB used, 964MB free) Max 6000MB/ Splitter 653 so far is involved without explicit memory allocation (java -jar .../splitter-latest/splitter.jar ...), using /java --version openjdk 11.0.22 2024-01-16 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.22+7-post-Debian-1deb10u1) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.22+7-post-Debian-1deb10u1, mixed mode, sharing)/ Following up on splitter tuning hints (areas.list gets generated in each case) I reduced --max-areas= from 4096 to 2048 to 1024, but to no avail (not even significantly on the runtimes), once I figured out the effect above. It fails on all first runs and succeeds on all shortly following next ones. Unfortunately its not possible to increase main hardware memory on the small machine, but system tools report only about 2...3 GB being used anyway. Is it possible to tweak Java to overcome the problem without hurting the maps, preferably by machine, to be able to run identical scripts? Some pointers would be appreciated, also on how to monitor the Java memory situation. Thanks, Felix

2 3

Commit r4918: add surface=chipseal to group of surfaces which means paved
by svn commit 09 Mar '24

09 Mar '24

Version mkgmap-r4918 was committed by gerd on Wed, 06 Mar 2024 add surface=chipseal to group of surfaces which means paved Patch chipseal.diff by Carlos Dávila http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4918

3 4

Missing surface=chipseal in default style
by Carlos Dávila 06 Mar '24

06 Mar '24

Hello all One user of my maps has reported estrange detours in New Zealand. I have found the reason was the lack of a rule for surface=chipseal in default lines style, causing those roads to be considered as unpaved. Attached patch fixes the issue. Carlos

2 1