December 2013 - mkgmap-dev - The mkgmap lists

process-exits vs process-destination
by Franco Bez 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

Hi all, is there a way to combine the features process-exits and process-destination in a single style ? Based on my experience process-desitnation does a marvellous job when entering a motorway ( does it also work with also trunk roads ? ), while process-extis is perfect when leaving a motorway or trunk road. For instance the roundabout here http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.89665&lon=10.64805&zoom=17 has two exits towards the B12. Routing from the "Sudetenstraße" going North (maybe towards Augsburg) I would like the Garmin device to announce "5 th Exit - B12 (München)". On the other hand routing to the South (maybe Kempten) it should announce "2nd exit - B12 (Kempten)". Using process-exits this does not work, it's only "5th Exit - B12" resp. "2nd Exit - B12". I would have to use process-destination instead to get the desired messages displayed. Coming home from the trip, routing from the B12 towards "Sudetenstraße" I would like "exit to the right - Exit Kaufbeuren". Using process-exits this works perfectly. Would I use process-destination I would get "exit to the right towards B12 Verteilerring" or even "exit to the right towards Sudetenstraße" a really useless announcement as the sign on the trunk road reads "Kaufbeuren / Neugablonz / Mauerstetten". So this is why I would like to have an option that combines the functionality of process-exits and process-destination. Do you see any way to achieve this in one single style ? Ciao, Franco

7 6

multi-word street search
by Michał Rogala 18 Dec '14

18 Dec '14

Hello! I've a problem regarding street search. In Poland (and I suppose few more countries also may have this issue) person-named streets can have two forms - long one: Miroslawa Dudka or short one: Dudka there is no standard for tagging such names in OSM. Problem is that Garmin/Mapsource search function is matching names from the beginning of the string, so if I enter "Dudka" it will find all streets named "Dudka" but not "Miroslawa Dutka". Do you have any idea how can I deal with such issue? best regards Michal Rogala

12 67

Bad performance because of complex boundary relation
by Gerd Petermann 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

Hi, this might be an OSM problem... While working on a "beautifyRoundabout" algo I wondered why one tile in Southamerica needed a very long time to calculate. It turned out to be a problem in the location hook. The boundary relation 1981462 is a very complex polygon. I don't see a simple solution in mkgmap, but wouldn't it be better to create a simple way enclosing the area to map this boundary? Gerd

4 3

question regarding MapRoad
by GerdP 25 Mar '14

25 Mar '14

Hi Steve, I'd like to change the way how MapRoad objects are handled in the sub division split process. Current implementation is like this: 1) StyledConverter creates a MapRoad instance with max. 250 points, if a road has more points, multiple instances are created, each with its own RoadDef. 2) When the sub divisions are created, a MapRoad is never split, so the final result is that each instance is written to exactly one sub division. The Garmin format seems to imply that we should rather split the MapRoad to match a given bbox of a sub division. This will produce smaller img files because the offsets to the sub division centers are smaller, and if we allow to start with MapRoad instances having > 250 points, we also have fewer NOD entries. I tried to implement this, but I can't find a nice way to store the information about the order of the segments of a road. This is needed when finally the RoadDef.addPolylineRef() method is called. I think that we either have to make sure that each part of a road is processed in the correct order, or we have to restore the order after all the filters where used. (For the different levels, a road will be split into different parts, if a road goes out and in we can have multiple segments in one sub div, not directly connected to each other) I have no idea yet how to do this. Can you help? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/question-regarding-MapRoad-tp5781633.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 10

Distorted lines
by Andrzej Popowski 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hi, I observe badly looking lines. I have attached some pictures and xml objects that doesn't look good on Garmin map. My guess is that there is no proper simplifications for resolution 24bit. Points too dense are removed in a non optimal way which can lead to jagged curves. This could be the reason for bad looking tram railways (file tram1.osm in test.zip). Other reason could be removing of short lines. I think in this case some nodes are moved. It looks like instead of creating a new node in a middle of removed line, first point is used. This can lead to bigger distortion. This is probably the case of road example (file road1.osm). -- Best regards, Andrzej

10 40

mergeroads sometimes breaks routing
by franco_bez 17 Feb '14

17 Feb '14

I found a very strange routing behaviour connected to the mergeroads-patch. The Problem area is here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/47.89307/10.63390 When I try to route ( Automobile-mode, minimize-time ) from corner Liegnitzer-Straße/Glogauer-Straße to Beuthener-Straße Nr. 11, I get routed all the way round the block. Using --x-no-mergeroads the routing is fine. Even stranger, when I tried to assemble a small testcase with an data-extract from JOSM, the routing is fine, even when using mergeroads. So the error seems to be triggered by something specific to the tile that was generated when building a map of Bayern. See screenshots: Bad Routing with mergeroads: <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5791132/mergeroads-9452.bmp> Routing OK with --x-no-mergeroads: <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5791132/no-mergeroads-19995.bmp> -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/mergeroads-sometimes-breaks-routing-tp579113… Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 11

Address Index problem
by Marek Greško 16 Feb '14

16 Feb '14

Hello, I am experiencing several issues using index search on my GPS unit. First is probably related to: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017760.html I have missing streets in Bratislava (Slovakia) in index. But I am not sure whether is is only in Bratislava (which uses districts). I tried to compile only partial map (cut off from Slovakian map) containing only corresponding part of Bratislava and streets are there. My address setup in style file is like this: # Slovakia mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level6=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level6}' } mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level9=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level9}' } mkgmap:country=SVK & mkgmap:city!=* & mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level8}' } ... which is with high probability correct. Second problem is, when I use code page 65001 when searching for streets I can filter only first character. Probably because of case sensitive search? I am unable to insert lowercase characters into my gps unit to test whether this is the real cause. When compiling with 1250 codepage, the search filter works correctly. Does the index need to be uppercased? Thank you Marek

4 15

Address search: city sometimes missing
by Thorsten Kukuk 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

Hi, I wasn't able to find specific addresses on my Garmin 62s, even if I did know that I entered them in OSM. During testing of my adjusted style for the new mkgmap version, I found out that the addresses are not missing, but that the addresses don't have a city assigned. That's why I cannot find them on my 62s, where I have to enter a city always, but with mapsource. The question is now, why? This happens with the default style of mkgmap, too, independent of the mkgmap version. For example, look here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.44674/11.03418 There are two buildings from Siemens, Von-der-Tann-Strasse 30 and 31 in 90439 Nuernberg. As you could see in the attached screenshot, only the housenumber 31 has a city assigned, the number 30 has not. I added some "echotags" to the style file: mkgmap:city is set correct to Nuernberg in all cases. Any idea what's going wrong? Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

4 18

Diagnostic warnings for dead-end oneway highway=service
by Marko Mäkelä 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

There are some dead-end highway=service,oneway=yes that trigger dead-end-check warnings in mkgmap RouteNode.java. To allow suppressing most of the warnings, years ago I added a check that suppresses the warning if either end node of the way is tagged with fixme=* or FIXME=*, such as fixme=continue. This is not always applicable, for example when the oneway highway=service is leading to a tunnel, which is omitted from the map in order to avoid clutter (such as ways for underground parking) in city areas. I figured out that it would be nice to display all tags of the dead-end oneway, like we do in MultiPolygonRelation, so that my mkgmap wrapper script could filter out any oneway warnings for highway=service. Unfortunately, the RoadDef is in the Garmin domain, and there is no RoadDef.toTagString() method. Any ideas how to improve the diagnostics? Marko

3 28

invalid types in check-styles
by nwillink 03 Jan '14

03 Jan '14

Hi Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles. It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I didn't use in my TYP file. invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is correctly identified as valid. I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero subtypes. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 9